Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17346 (RAJ)

SAUDDIN S/O HANEEF v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4062/2025 · 2026-01-30

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4488] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4062/2025 Sauddin S/o Haneef, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Neemala, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 30/01/2026 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.224/2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2), 61(2)(a) and 66 of BNS, the accused- petitioner has preferred the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case solely on the basis of disclosure statement of the other co-accused. He further submits that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, therefore, anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. [2026:RJ-JP:4488] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4062/2025] 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused- petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused- petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Sauddin S/o Haneef, in connection with FIR No.224/2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Anmol/Rashmi/21