Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17345 (JHR)

SURESH BESRA @ BHADU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4325/2026 · 2026-06-19

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:17937] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4325 of 2026 ------ Suresh Besra @ Bhadu, aged about 33 years, Son of Pandu Besra, Resident of Village- Pagda, P.O. & P.S.- Bodam, District- East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Akshay Kr. Mahato, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-19-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 511 of 2024 arising out of Bodam P.S. Case No. 19 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. This is the third journey of the petitioner with the prayer for regular bail. Earlier the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was once rejected by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 29.01.2025 passed in B.A. No. 9256 of 2024 and subsequently, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 26.02.2026 passed in B.A. No. 747 of 2026. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the fresh ground is that in the meanwhile, so far ten (10) out of the eleven (11) charge-sheeted witnesses have been examined in this case during the trial and none of them stated anything to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 06.07.2024 as mentioned in para-17 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur in connection with S.T. Case No. 511 of 2024 arising out of Bodam P.S. Case No. 19 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 19.06.2026 Saroj/