LEKHRAJ MEENA S/O SHRI GOBARI LAL MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/5211/2019 · 2026-01-15
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17343 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17343 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1756] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5211/2019
1. Lekhraj Meena S/o Shri Gobari Lal Meena, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Rampuriya, Post Lakhsanija Tehsil Digod, District Kota.
2. Neeraj Malav S/o Mohan Lal Malav, R/o House No. 442, Keshavpura, Sector-4, Kota ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary And Commissioner Department Of Panchayati Raj, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner
3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Kota
4. District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Kota
5. Chief Block Education Officer, Block Sultanpur District Kota
6. Peeo, Sr. Secondary School Lakhsanija, Block Sultanpur District Kota ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitesh Rana For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saumil Sharma for Mr. Gopal Krishna Sharma, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 15/01/2026
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer:
“By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby impugned orders dated 01.02.2019 & 07.02.2019 issued by the respondents may kindly be quashed and set aside.
[2026:RJ-JP:1756] (2 of 3) [CW-5211/2019] By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents may kindly be directed not to reduce the salary & allowance of the petitioners and not to recover any amount from his salary”.
2.
Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 13.08.2019 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3063/2019 titled as Dal Chand Jat Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Anr. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order.
3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Dal Chand Jat Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Anr. (supra).
4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Dal Chand Jat Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Anr. (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in their representation. If the
[2026:RJ-JP:1756] (3 of 3) [CW-5211/2019] petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioners, then same benefits be extended.
6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /75