275 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA HEMANT MAKOL @ HIMMAT MOKAL STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Aditya Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Navraj Singh Mahal, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Fateh Sahota, Advocate for respondent No.2. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accor All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 16.04.2026 himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH HEMANT MAKOL @ HIMMAT MOKAL VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Aditya Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Navraj Singh Mahal, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Fateh Sahota, Advocate for respondent No.2. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRM-M-4897-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 16.04.2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Aditya Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Navraj Singh Mahal, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Fateh Sahota, Advocate for respondent No.2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be HIMANSHU 2026.04.16 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document