COCP No.1067 of 2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 108 COCP No.1067 of 2026 Date of decision: April 7th, 2026 Vijay Aggarwal ...Petitioner Versus Uttam Singh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Raj Pratap Singh Brar, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. On 11.03.2026, this Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Present:- Mr. Sirat Sapra, Advocate for Ms. Rashika Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prays for an adjournment. No adjournment slip has been filed. However, in the interest of justice, adjourned to 18.03.2026. Last opportunity is granted to the petitioner to argue the matter. March 11, 2026” PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.04.09 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh COCP No.1067 of 2026 2 2. On 18.03.2026, none had appeared and a written request for adjournment was filed and the case was adjourned to 25.3.2026. Again on 25.03.2026, a written request for adjournment was filed and the case was adjourned to 07.04.2026. Today no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner and an adjournment slip has been filed on the ground that the petitioner has died and the instructions are still awaited. 3. In view of the same, this Court is of the opinion that sufficient time has been granted to the counsel for getting instructions and accordingly the present petition is disposed of. 4. Liberty is granted to the LRs of the petitioner to revive the present petition in case they wish to pursue the case or in case any cause survives. April 7th, 2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.04.09 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh