Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17332 (JHR)

SULEN MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/64/2026 · 2026-06-19

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:18013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.64 of 2026 ------ Sulen Mahto, son of Late Balo Mahatwain, Ex-Sweeper (V.C. Cell, BAU, Kanke, Ranchi), resident of Nadi Kinare, Garu Bhagalpur, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Dr. Sunil Chandra Dubey, The Vice Chancellor, Birsa Agriculture University, P.O. Kanke, P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi. … … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Niraj Kishore, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Kumar Pawan, AC to SC Mines-III Mr. Amritansh Vats, Advocate Mr. Arpan M. Ekka, Advocate ----- 03/ 19.06.2026 Heard the parties. 2. This Contempt case has been filed by the petitioner against non-compliance of order dated 11.08.2025 passed in W.P.(S) No.2992 of 2025. 3. It has been submitted that a reasoned order has been passed on 31.10.2025 rejecting the claim of the petitioner. 4. Considering the aforesaid fact, since by the aforesaid order passed by this Court in writ jurisdiction, the opposite parties were only directed to pass a reasoned order and since the same has been passed, no contempt is made out, as correctness of the said order cannot be looked into in this Contempt application. 5. Accordingly, this contempt proceeding is dropped. 6. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the reasoned order before the appropriate Forum. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 19th June, 2026 Prashant. Cp-2 Uploaded on 22.06.2026