Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17331 (CAL)

DEBASHISH CHAKRABORTY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(R)/27/2026 · 2026-03-25

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25.03.2026 Serial no. 15 [G.S.D] CRM (R) 27 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with BGR Case No. 3225 of 2025 corresponding to Basanti Police Station Case No. 352 of 2025 dated 29.06.2025 u/s 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946. -And- In the matter of : Debashish Chakraborty … Petitioner(s) Md. Adil Badr, Jr. Govt. Adv. Ms. Sonali Bhar … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner is not present. Learned advocate for the State submits that it is the admitted position that the petitioner is a resident of Khulna, Bangladesh. The petitioner was arrested on or about 29.06.2025 and charge-sheet has already been submitted before the learned jurisdictional court. Having considered that seven witnesses have been relied upon by the prosecution, I direct the learned trial court to proceed with the stage of consideration of charges and, at least, make substantial progress within the next six months so far as the trial is concerned. Considering the stage of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. 2 Accordingly, CRM(R) 27 of 2026 is dismissed. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)