RAJ KUMAR SHARMA v. CIVIL JUDGE J D SOUTH KOTA AND
CW/11305/2008 · 2026-01-13
Bipin Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17328 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17328 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1353] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11305/2008 Raj Kumar Sharma S/o Vijay Kumar Ji Sharma, Lal Burj, Bheru Gudri Ward, Brijrajpura, Kota Through Power Of Attorney Yogesh Pancholi S/o Indra Kumar Pancholi, House No. K-4, Sabarmati Colony, Kathooni Pole, Kota Raj. ----Plaintiff-Petitioner Versus
1. Civil Judge (JD), South, Kota.
2. Om Prakash S/o Vishnu Chand Ji, Durga Lime Factory, Brijrajpura, Kota.
3. Bharat Bhushan S/o Vishnu Chand Ji, 112/79, Agarwal Farm, Mansarovar, Jaipur Raj.
4. Pawan Kumar S/o Vishnu Chand Ji Brahmin, Durga Lime Factory, Brijrajpura, Kota. ----Defendant-Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vimal Kumar Jain with Mr. Shubham Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order 13/01/2026 With the consent of the parties, the present civil writ petition is disposed of in the following terms: (i) The petitioner shall be at liberty to first value his suit. After valuation of the suit by the plaintiff, he may also incorporate a paragraph regarding the Court fees paid by him. (ii) Upon completion thereof, the learned trial court shall decide Preliminary Issue No. 2 on the basis of the valuation and Court fees paid by the petitioner-plaintiff.
[2026:RJ-JP:1353] (2 of 2) [CW-11305/2008] (iii) The learned trial court shall further determine whether the suit falls within its pecuniary jurisdiction and whether proper Court fees have been paid or not. (iv) The said preliminary issue shall be decided in accordance with law, without being influenced by the
order dated 18.08.2008. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/111