Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17327 (JHR)

SIRIL SOREN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1803/2026 · 2026-06-19

Rajesh Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:17875 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1803 of 2026 ---- Siril Soren, aged about 24 years, son of Late Manwel Soren, Resident of Village – Sarak Tola, Sawalapur, Post Office – Bakudih, Police Station – Tinpahar, District – Sahibganj. …. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Adv. For the State : Mr. Satish Kr. Keshri, A.P.P. ---- 03/Dated: 19th June, 2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State. 2. The applicant who is in custody since 20.06.2023 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Tinpahar P.S. Case No.32 of 2023 corresponding to S.T. No.290 of 2023, registered for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Rajmahal. 3. Earlier the bail application of the applicant was dismissed on merit in B.A. No.11012 of 2023 vide order dated 17.01.2024. 4. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made. 5. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and it has been submitted that the prosecution evidence is already complete. 6. Considering the fact that the prosecution evidence is closed, I am not inclined to the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the present bail application stands rejected. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 19th June, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded on 22.06.2026