Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17314 (JHR)

NEERAJ KUMAR PANDIT v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/2478/2026 · 2026-06-17

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:17565 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2478 of 2026 --------- Neeraj Kumar Pandit aged about 29 years son of Dindayal Pandit, resident of Bhadriya, P.O. Bhadriya, P.S. Rajabhitha, District Godda. ....Petitioner(s) Versus 1. State of Jharkhand. 2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Home Prison and Disaster Management Government of Jharkhand, Office at Project Building P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi. 3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Prison and Disaster Management, Government of Jharkhand, Office at Project Building P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi. 4. The Director General of Police Jharkhand, Ranchi Office at Police Head Quarter, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi. 5. The District Magistrate Cum Deputy Commissioner, Godda, P.O. and P.S. Godda, District Godda. 6. Superintendent of Police, Godda, P.O. and P.S. Godda, District Godda. 7. Sub Divisional Officer, Godda, P.O. and P.S. Godda, District Godda. 8. Deputy Collector (Incharge) (General section) Godda, P.O. and P.S. Godda, District Godda. 9. Circle Officer, Godda, P.O. and P.S. Godda, District Godda. ....Respondent(s) --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner(s) : M/s. Priyanka Boby, Rajni Singh, Advocates For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Ratnesh Kumar, S.C.(L&C)-I --------- 02/Dated:-17.06.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein to quash Clause 6 of Advertisement No.01/2024 dated 15.03.2024 issued by the District Magistrate- cum-Deputy Commissioner, Godda. 3. It has been informed that pursuant to the Advertisement No.01/2024, the result has been published. 2026:JHHC:17565 2 4. Having regard to the aforesaid, since the entire process of appointment has completed, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands dismissed. Pending I.A., if any also stands closed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) JUNE 17, 2026 vikas/- uploaded