Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17312 (CHH)

SHATRANJAN SINGH HARMUKH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/481/2026 · 2026-02-18

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:8785 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 481 of 2026 1 - Shatranjan Singh Harmukh S/o Ramadhaar Singh Harmukh Aged About 70 Years R/o House No 160, Ward No.05, Tedesara Tehsil And District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 2 - Dagam Singh Harmukh S/o Ramadhaar Singh Harmukh Aged About 55 Years R/o Village- Anjora Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.) 3 - Prem Singh Harmukh S/o Ramadhaar Singh Harmukh Aged About 69 Years R/o Bazar Chowk Thanaud Village- Anjora Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.) 4 - Tarun Kumar Deshmukh S/o Nepal Singh Deshmukh Aged About 56 Years R/o Ward No.5, Gandhi Chowk Village- Anjora Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.) 5 - Kaushal Deshmukh S/o Nepal Singh Deshmukh Aged About 56 Years R/o Ward No 5, Gandhi Chowk Village - Anjora Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary Department Of Home Affairs Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Atal Nagar Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Superintendent Of Police Durg District- Durg (C.G.) 3 - Station House Officer Police Station Pulgaon Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) HEERA LAL SAHU Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2026.02.19 15:55:49 +0530 2 4 - Mukesh Kumar Chakradhari S/o Somnath Chakradhari Aged About 55 Years R/o Ward No.02, Pishegaon Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.) 5 - Prerit Chandrakar S/o Somnath Pawan Chandrakar Aged About 62 Years R/o Kasaridih Kanhiyapuri Padamnabhapur Near Hanuman Temple Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioners : None. For State : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nande, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 19/02/2026 1. On 13.02.2026 and today also no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Thus, it appears that the petitioners are not interested in this case. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioners, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu