$~89 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010403752026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1557/2026 & CM APPL. 58027/2026 UMESH KUMAR TANWAR AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anurag Jain, Mr. M.K. Khan, Mr. Aman Mirza and Ms. Tanzeem Bano, Advs. Mob: 9873787009 Email: adv.kasimkhan@gmail.com versus SH. SANJEEV KHIRWAR THE COMMISSIONER OF MCD AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kunal Rawat, Ms. Vanshika Varshney and Mr. Charanjeet Singh, Advs. for R-1/MCD Mob: 9312012009 Mr. Pramod Kumar and Mr. Mayank Dhyani panel counsel for R-3 (Through VC) Mob: 9717888012 Email: prmdkumar20@gmail.com Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Senior Panel Counsel for R-4 to 6/UOI with Mr. Suraj Kumar Jha, Adv. (Through VC) Mob:9958378565 Mr. Hemant Chaudhri and Mr. Ranjan Vyas, Advs. for R-7 Mob: 9810035336 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2026 at 11:15:16 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA O R D E R % 31.08.2026 1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 22nd May, 2026, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 7295/2026, wherein, directions were issued in the following manner: “ ” 2. In response, learned counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”) has handed over to this Court, certain documents in order to show that requisite action against the property in question already stands taken. 3. The said documents are taken on record. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2026 at 11:15:16 4. This Court notes the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the MCD that action was taken on 25th August, 2026, and the existing construction in the property in question has been made inhabitable. 5. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that further construction in the property in question, is going on. 6. Learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 7 to 9 disputes the said fact, and submits that no construction is going on presently at the property in question. 7. He further draws the attention of this Court to the paragraph 11 of the present petition, which reads as under: “xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx” 8. By referring to the aforesaid, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 7 to 9 submits that the petitioner and respondent nos. 7 to 9 are cousins, and that the present petition is more in the nature of a private property dispute. 9. Considering the submissions made before this Court, it is directed that the MCD and the Police shall ensure that no unauthorized construction takes place in the property in question. 10. However, respondent nos. 7 to 9 are at liberty to carry out construction after obtaining due sanction from the MCD. 11. Noting the aforesaid, the present petition is accordingly disposed of. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2026 at 11:15:16 12. Pending application also stands disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 31, 2026/SK This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2026 at 11:15:16