[2026:RJ-JP:4831] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4588/2020 1. Gayatri Kulria D/o Shri Jaswant Singh Kulria, Aged About 39 Years, R/o 312/a, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Nagar, Gopal Pura Bypass, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. Kamla Sihag D/o Shri Sarwan Kumar Sihag W/o Shri Sanjay Sihag, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Udansar, Post Gangyasar, Tehsil Fatepur, District Sikar (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Personnel And Administrative, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ghooghra Ghati, Ajmer (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Pragya Seth Mr. Kamlesh Sharma Mr. Nakul Bansal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sweekriti Sharma for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC Mr. M.F. Baig HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 02/02/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “i) the impugned action of the respondent in picking up candidates against the non-joiners for the post of Clerk Grade-II in the impugned meritlist dated 28.02.2020, may kindly be declared illegal and arbitrary and therefore, same may kindly be quashed and set aside; [2026:RJ-JP:4831] (2 of 2) [CW-4588/2020] ii) By issuing appropriate writ or direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to: a) award 01 grace mark each to the humble Petitioners in one of the Papers of Phase-II Examination where humble Petitioners could not secure minimum marks and further revise the Impugned meritlist dated 28.02.2020; (b) To treat humble Petitioners eligible for the post of LDC in pursuance to the LDC Direct Recruitment Examination, 2013; (c) To give joining to humble Petitioners on the post of LDC with all consequential benefits.” 2. Application No.01/2026 is filed for disposal in light of judgment dated 27.04.2018 in case of Babbal Devi Meena and Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. in DB SAW No.1666/2017. 3. Having considered the submissions and also the material placed on record, instant writ petition is disposed of in light of ratio laid down in case of Babbal Devi Meena and Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). 4. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /48