Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17304 (KAR)

N ADISHESHA v. BANGALORE CITY CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD

WP/14155/2022 · 2026-03-05

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13516 WP No. 14155 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 14155 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. N ADISHESHA S/O LATE NARASIMHALU AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT NO.26, 1ST CROSS, 6TH MAIN ROAD, VINAYAKA EXTENSION, MYSORE ROAD BANGALORE-560017 2. SMT SHABIN TAJ W/O LATE SAZEEM PASHA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 3. SMT SHAHEENA W/O KUDHARATH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 4. SMT FATHIMA W/O NAWAZ AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 5. SRI HAROON S/O GOUSPEER AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13516 WP No. 14155 of 2022 ALL ARE OCCUPATION COOLIE R/O AT NO.26, 1ST CROSS, 6TH MAIN ROAD, VINAYAKA EXTENSION, MYSORE ROAD BANGALORE-560017 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUKANYA H D., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. BANGALORE CITY CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD PAMPAMAHAKAVI ROAD, CHAMARAJAPET BANGALORE-560018 REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER 2. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER BANGALORE CITY CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD BANGALORE-560018 REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. LOKESH K V, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED PASSED BY THE LEARNED 3RD ADDL METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BANGALORE UNDER SECTION 14 OF THE SECUTRIZATION AND RECONSTRUCTIONS OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT 2022 IN CLR MISC NO.2072/2019 DTD.27.8.2019 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-J. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13516 WP No. 14155 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER This writ petition is of the year 2022. The petitioners have filed this petition questioning the order passed by the Magistrate under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. On 22.07.2022, the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has granted interim order directing the petitioners to pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- before the respondent - Bank within two weeks. When the matter came up before this Court on 08.08.2022, I.A.No.2/2022 is disposed of granting further four weeks. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent - Bank that such order is complied with by the petitioner but the outstanding amount is Rs.20,00,000/-. The learned counsel for the respondent - Bank submits that thereafter, no amount is paid. On 04.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and this Court - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13516 WP No. 14155 of 2022 directed the matter to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal'. 3. Today when the matter came up there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the matter. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE RB