[2026:RJ-JP:6883] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 280/2012 1. Madhu W/o Late Shri Surgyan aged about 35 years, r/o Badi Jamat, ward No.10, Chhawani, Neemkathana, District Sikar. 2. Sunder S/o Late Shri Surgyan aged about 19 years, r/o Badi Jamat, ward No.10, Chhawani, Neemkathana, District Sikar. 3. Sonu D/o Late Shri Surgyan aged about 17 years, (minor through Legal Guardian Mother Madhu Devi, r/o Badi Jamat, ward No.10, Chhawani, Neemkathana, District Sikar. 4. Neetu D/o Late Shri Surgyan aged about 15 years, (Minor through Legal Guardian Mother Madhu Devi, r/o Badi Jamat, ward No.10, Chhawani, Neemkathana, District Sikar. ----Appellants Versus 1. Rameshwar Das S/o Shri Bhagu Singh Chela Gopal Das, r/o Badi Jamat, Ward No.10, Chhawani, Neemkathana, District Sikar 2. Guman S/o Shri Bhagu Singh aged about 56 years, r/o Badi Jamat, Ward No.10, Chhawani, Neemkathana, District Sikar 3. Shanti Devi W/o Late Sharwan Singh aged about 56 years, r/o Badi Jamat, Ward No.10, Chhawani, Neemkathana, District Sikar 4. Pooran s/o Late Sharwan Singh, aged about 27 years r/o Badi Jamat, Ward No.10, Chhawani, Neemkathana, District Sikar 5. Ballu s/o Late Sharwan Singh, aged about 19 years r/o Badi Jamat, Ward No.10, Chhawani, Neemkathana, District Sikar 6. Shankar Lal s/o Late Sharwan Singh, aged about 21 years, r/o Badi Jamat, Ward No.10, Chhawani, Neemkathana, District Sikar ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Shiv S Ola For Respondent(s) : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Verma with Mr. Vishal Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 12/02/2026 1. Matter comes up on an application (IA No.1/2026) filed by the applicant/respondent No.1 under Section 151 of the Code of [2026:RJ-JP:6883] (2 of 2) [CSA-280/2012] Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), seeking disposal of the case in terms of the compromise dated 30.05.2025 arrived at between the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that, during the pendency of the present Civil Second Appeal, the parties have resolved their dispute amicably and have handed over possession of the suit property in terms of the said compromise dated 30.05.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants, upon instructions from his clients, does not dispute the aforesaid statement, and accordingly prays for withdrawal of the present Civil Second Appeal in terms of the aforesaid compromise dated 30.05.2025. 4. Accordingly, the present civil second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty that in case, any cause of action still survives, the appellants shall be at liberty to move an application for revival of the present second appeal. 5. All Pending applications, including IA No.1/2026, stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/78