Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17303 (CHH)

SHRAWAN KUMAR SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7823/2024 · 2026-02-18

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 3 2026:CGHC:8979 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7823 of 2024 1 - Shrawan Kumar Sahu S/o Manishankar Sahu, Aged About 43 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government Naveen Primary School, Hardi, Block Akaltara, District-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2 - Dr. Anuradha Govind W/o Vivek Govind, Aged About 41 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government Primary School, Devgaon, Block Mungeli, District-Mungeli (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, General Administrative Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Block-3, 1st Floor, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Joint Director (Education), Education Division, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2026.02.24 10:34:20 +0530 2 / 3 5 - District Education Officer, Janjgir-Champa, District-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 6 - District Education Officer, Mungeli, District-Mungeli (C.G.) 7 - Block Education Officer, Akaltara, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 8 - Block Education Officer, Mungeli, District-Mungeli (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 19/02/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, petitioners are not pressing this writ petition on merit and only seeking a direction to respondent No.5 to take decision on pending representation of petitioners within specified time. 2. Learned counsel for the State submits that he is not having any objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. On due consideration of submission of learned counsel for the parties, without observing anything on merit of case, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing respondent No.5 to take decision on pending representation of petitioners, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 3 / 3 4. Petitioners will be at liberty to submit fresh representation before the concerned authority if they so desire. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen