SRI D JAGADEESH v. THE COMMISSIONER OF KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD
WP/5091/2026 · 2026-02-17
Suraj Govindaraj
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17297 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17297 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9832 WP No. 5091 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 5091 OF 2026 (LB-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SRI. D JAGADEESH S/O LATE SRI. D. DHARMARATHNAKAR AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
2. SMT. D PREMA D/O LATE SRI. D. DHARMARATHNAKAR AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
3. SRI. D. VIJAYA S/O LATE SRI. D. DHARMARATHNAKAR AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
4. SRI. D. PRAKASH S/O LATE SRI. D. DHARMARATHNAKAR AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
5. SMT. MAMATHA D/O LATE SRI. D. DHARMARATHNAKAR AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
6. SMT. D. BHAGYA D/O LATE SRI. D. DHARMARATHNAKAR AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
7. SRI. D NITEESH S/O LATE SRI D DHARMARTHNAAR
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9832 WP No. 5091 of 2026
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT TOREMAVU VILLAGE, CHIKAYYANA CHATHRA HOBLI, NANJANAGUD TALUK, MYSURU DIST - 571 302. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. DESAI SHARANABASAPPA VIRANNA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, KAVERY BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. 2. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MYSURU DIVISIONAL OFFICE OF KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, KHB COMPLEX KUVEMPUNAGAR, MYSURU - 570 023. 3. THE ASST. REVENUE OFFICER MYSURU DIVISIONAL OFFICE OF KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, KHB COMPLEX KUVEMPUNAGAR, MYSURU - 570 023. 4. SMT. S. PRAMEELA W/O LATE S. NANJUNDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS NO.37, D-16, YADAVAGIRI DEVARAJA MOHALLA, PARAMAHAMSA ROAD 3RD MAIN, MYSURU - 570 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHARAN P. SABARAD, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3;
NOTICE TO R4 DISPENSED WITH)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-3
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9832 WP No. 5091 of 2026
TO CONSIDER THE OBJECTION DTD 27.01.2026 (ANNX-H) OF THE PETITIONERS TO EXECUTE AN ABSOLUTE SALE DEED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF LIG HOUSE BEARING NEW NO. 37 D-16 (OLD NO. 37) SITUATED AT YADAVAGIRI, DEVARAJ MOHALLA, VANI VILASA PURAM, PARAMAHOAMSA, 3RD MAIN, MYSURU AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. Sri. Sharan P. Sabarad, learned counsel accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2.
Notice to respondent No.4 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order to be passed. 3. Petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. A Writ of mandamus directing the Respondents No. 3 to consider the Objection Date. 27-01-2026 (Annexure-H) of the petitioners to Execute an Absolute Sale Deed in favour of the Petitioners in respect of LIG House bearing New No.37 D-16 (Old No.37) situated at Yadavagiri, Devaraj Mohalla, Vani vilasa Puram, Paramahoamsa, 3rd Main. Mysuru.,
b. A direction court deems fit in the interest of justice. - 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9832 WP No. 5091 of 2026
4. The grievance of the petitioners is that the objection filed by the petitioners to the application submitted by respondent No.4 is not being considered by the respondents. 5. Whenever any objection is submitted by a citizen, the same would have to be considered by the respondents. In that view of the matter, directing the respondents to consider the objection and pass necessary orders in accordance with law, the petition stands disposed of. 6. Needless to say, until orders are passed on the said objection, no other steps can be taken by the respondents. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
GJM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 31