Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1729 (KAR)

SMT TARA B v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/9243/2026 · 2026-04-02

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18351 WP No. 9243 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 9243 OF 2026 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SMT TARA B W/O SRI. LAKSHMANA.H.P, AGE 51 YEARS, R/AT HAMPAURA VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-562109 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVINDRA PRASAD B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. REP. BY PRINCIPLE SECRETARY. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RAMANGARA TOWN, BANGALORE-MYSORE HIGHWAY, BANGALORE SOUTH DIST.-562 159. Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18351 WP No. 9243 of 2026 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KAGGALIPURA POLICE STATION, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, KAGGALIPURA, BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT - 560116. 5. SRI. C.P. YOGESHWAR, S/O LATE PUTTAMADEGOWDA, AGE 62 YEARS, OCC: SITTING MLA OF KARNATAKA, R/AT NO.143, CHAKKERE VILLAGE, MALURU HOBLI, CHANNAPATTANA TALUK, BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT-562 160. 6. M/S. MEGA CITY DEVELOPER PVT., LTD OFFICE/AT NO.1, CHANDRALOK, 5TH CROSS, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 009. REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR. REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT-1956 7. SRI. C.P. GANGADARESHWAR S/O LATE. PUTTAMADEGOWDA, AGE 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.143, CHAKKERE VILLAGE, MALURU HOBLI, CHANNAPATTANA TALUK, BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT-562 160. 8. SRI. C.P. RAJESHWARA, S/O LATE PUTTAMADEGOWDA, AGE 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.143, CHAKKERE VILLAGE, MALURU HOBLI, CHANNAPATTANA TALUK, BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT-562 160. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIKAS ROJIPURA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4 V/O DATED 24.03.2026, NOTICE TO R5 TO R8 ARE DEFERRED) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18351 WP No. 9243 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE DIRECTION TO THE OFFICIALS OF 3RD AND 4TH RESPONDENT POLICE NOT TO INTERMEDDLED WITH THE PROPERTIES OF THE PETITIONER OF CONVERTED LAND BEARING SY NO.21 OLD NO.14 AND 8, MEASURING 01 ACRE 20 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT KRISHNARAJAPURA VILLAGE, HAMPAPURA DHAKALE, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK WITHOUT ANY DIRECTION BY ANY COMPETENT COURT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER The captioned writ petition is instituted alleging high-handed and unwarranted interference by the police officials, arrayed as respondent Nos.3 and 4, in what is essentially a private civil dispute between the parties. The gist of the petitioner’s complaint is that - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18351 WP No. 9243 of 2026 the police, under the guise of exercising their authority, have exceeded their jurisdiction and have attempted to intermeddle in matters which fall squarely within the domain of the competent civil Court. 2. This Court, having taken cognizance of the serious allegations made in the writ petition, by order dated 24.03.2026, directed the learned Additional Government Advocate to secure and produce the CCTV footage of the concerned police station for the date 15.03.2026. The said direction was issued with a view to ascertain the veracity of the petitioner’s allegation that he was compelled to remain seated in the police station notwithstanding the dismissal of the civil suit instituted by the complainant. 3. In compliance with the aforesaid direction, the learned Additional Government Advocate submits - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18351 WP No. 9243 of 2026 that the CCTV footage has been secured and is made available before the Court. However, he fairly submits that the entire footage spanning the day has not yet been thoroughly examined. 4. The jurisdictional Police Officer, who is present before this Court, upon instructions, submits and assures that the petitioner shall not hereafter be summoned or subjected to any form of coercive action in relation to the subject property dispute, which is civil in nature. The said submission and assurance are placed on record. 5. Be that as it may, this Court also takes note of the fact that an NCR (Non-Cognizable Report) endorsement has been issued to the complainant, thereby appropriately relegating him to seek redressal of his grievances before the competent civil Court. In that view of the matter, and with a stern caution that - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18351 WP No. 9243 of 2026 the police authorities shall refrain from interfering in disputes of a purely civil nature, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition. Accordingly, the captioned petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE ALB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 75