Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010081502023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 4034 OF 2023 Between:
1. KARTHAKULA PRASAD RAO, S/O LATE VENKANNA HINDU, MALE, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, ADVOCATE RIO DOOR NO. 2-67, NEAR AMEDKAR STATUE, VARIGHEDU VILLAGE, ATTILI MANDAL SEETHANAGARAM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. COLLECTOR, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
3. DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, VARIGHEDU VILLAGE, ATTILI MANDAL SEETHANAGARAM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
5. RAPAKA NANI, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU MALE, 20 YEARS, PMP, R/O NEAR AMBEDKAR STATUE VARIGHEEDU VILLAGE, ATILLI MANDAL, W.G.DIST.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PANDURI RAMAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) The Court made the following order: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 20.01.2026, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 27.01.2026 BSK
30 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 4034 OF 2023
Date: 27.01.2026 BSK