APHC010081862026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4767/2026 Between: MYLAPILLI ANURADHA, W/O LATE KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 60-27-80, INDUSTRIAL HOUSING COLONY, MALKAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530011 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI. GUNTUR DISTRICT.- 522503 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. SURYABAGH, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530020 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MALKAPURAM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM- 530011 4. SRI CHEKURI MANIKANTH VARMA, S/O CH.S.S.N. RAJU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/O SOFTWARE ENGINEER, R/O. 60-27-80/1, INDISTRIAL HOUSING COLONY, MALKAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530011 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: VAMSI KRISHNA VARANASI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.4767 of 2026 Dated 27.02.2026 GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 and 3 herein in interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent relating to O S No 405 of 2025 on the file of the VI Additional Senior Civil Judge Visakhapatnam as illegal arbitrary without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India Consequently direct the Respondents 2 and 3 not to summon threaten harass or in any manner interfere with the petitioner in connection with the said civil dispute except in accordance with due process of law and to pass….” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Mr. Vamsi Krishna Varanasi, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are interfering with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the 4th respondent relating to O.S.No.405 of 2025 on the file of the learned VI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the sister of Respondent No.4 lodged a complaint before Respondent No.3. Basing on the said report, Respondent No.3 called the petitioner to the Police Station through phone to ascertain the facts and allegations raised by the sister of Respondent No.4 for the purpose of preliminary enquiry, but the petitioner neither responded nor turned up to the 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.4767 of 2026 Dated 27.02.2026 Police Station. On 30.01.2026, the petitioner sent a petition through post stating that the same issue is pending before the VI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, in O.S.No.405 of 2025 and I.A.No.877 of 2025 and that they want to settle the matter in the Civil Court only. Upon perusing the contents of the petitioner’s representation, Respondent No.3 informed the sister of Respondent No.4 that the issue is civil in nature and advised them to settle the matter before the Civil Court, as the case is already pending before the VI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. 5. Considering the above submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the Respondent No.3 not to further call the petitioner at the behest of the unofficial respondent in connection with the civil dispute pending between the parties and not to interfere in the said civil disputes. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 27.02.2026 RSI 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.4767 of 2026 Dated 27.02.2026 179 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4767 of 2026 Date: 27.02.2026 RSI