Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17280 (JHR)

MITHILESH YADAV @ MITHILESH KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3659/2026 · 2026-06-19

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:18005 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3659 of 2026 Mithilesh Yadav @ Mithilesh Kumar , aged about 35 Years, son of Madhusudan Yadav @ Madusudan Yadav, resident of village - Siyantar, Post office-Jasidih, Police Station - Jasidih, District Deoghar, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav , Adv. For the State : Mr. Anup Pawan Topo , Addl.. PP 03 / 19.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jasidih P.S. case no. 115/2022 instituted under Section 302, 201 of I.P.C. of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed murder of the grand-daughter of the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner for having committed the offence punishable under Section 306 of IPC, only because the petitioner is in love with the deceased, hence, it is alleged that the petitioner has abetted the suicide of the deceased. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 24/02/2026, as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar in connection with Jasidih P.S. case no. 115/2022 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 19.06.2026 Smita/-