Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17279 (PNJ)

DHARMA v. TOTA RAM

RSA/4696/2003 · 2026-05-11

Deepak Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 103 CM-6302-C-2026; CM-6303-C-2026 in/and RSA-4696-2003 Date of Decision:11.05.2026 Dharma (since deceased) thr LRs …..Appellant Vs. Tota Ram .….Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Abhilaksh Grover, Advocate and Ms. Nandini Gupta, Advocate for the applicant-appellant. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) RSA-4696-2003 was admi(ed wayback on 17.12.2007. Today applica-on bearing No.CM-6302-C-2026 is moved for fixing actual date of hearing for final disposal of the case as ma(er has been compromised between the par-es. Allowed. The main case i.e. RSA-4696-2003 is taken on board today itself for hearing. CM-6303-C-2026 This is an applica-on under Order XXIII Rule 3 moved by the appellant for withdrawal of the appeal in view of the mutual compromise dated 18.04.2026 (Annexure A-1), entered between the par-es. Perusal of the record would reveal that there is sole appellant Dharma and sole respondent Tota Ram. LRs of the sole appellant Dharma were earlier brought on record. Out of them his widow Smt. Meena Devi is stated to have expired, as informed by the learned counsel. The other 04 LRs of Dharma are party to the compromise. NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.05.11 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CM-6302-C-2026; CM-6303-C-2026 in/and RSA-4696-2003 -2- Though LRs of Tota Ram have not come on record as he is stated to have expired but Mr. Aman Arora, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of all the LRs. He has placed on record his power of a(orney and submits that there are as many as 07 LRs of Tota Ram and all of them are party to the compromise and therefore, the LRs of sole respondent Tota have no objec-on, in case, the appeal is permi(ed to be withdrawn in terms of compromise (Annexure A-1). In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for both the sides, the applica-on is accepted. The main case i.e. RSA-4696-2003 is permi(ed to be withdrawn on account of the compromise dated 18.04.2026 (Annexure A-1) which shall form part and parcel of the order. Needless to say that both the par-es shall abide by the terms and condi-ons of the compromise. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE May 11, 2026 Nee-ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.05.11 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document