Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010249802025 2026:GAU-AS:204 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3656/2025 SMTI DALIMI DEKA W/O-LATE RANJIT DEKA, R/O-VILLAGE-W/N-2, UDALGURI TOWN, NALBARI, P.O. P.S.-UDALGURI, DISTRICT- UDALGURI, BTAD, ASSAM, PIN CODE-784509. VERSUS SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD 1000-E/8, RIICO INDUSTRIAL AREA SITAPURA, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN- 302022 AND HAVING A BRANCH OFFICE AT B.R. ARCADE, 3RD FLOOR, 21 JANAPATH, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI-781007. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P MAZUMDER, MR N ALAM,MR. S CHAUHAN Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R GOSWAMI, MS. M SAIKIA,MS. P BORTHAKUR Linked Case : MACApp./437/2025 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. 1000-E/8 RIICO INDUATRIAL AREA SITAPURA JAIPUR RAJASTHAN- 302022 AND HAVING A BRANCH OFFICE AT B.R. ARCADE 3RD FLOOR 21 JANAPATH ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007. VERSUS DALIMI DEKA AND 2 ORS B W/O LATE RANJIT DEKA VILL.- W/N-2 Page No.# 2/3 UDALGURI TOWN NALBARI P.S.- UDALGURI DIST.- UDALGURI BTAD ASSAM PIN- 784509. 2:RAJA RAY S/O RAMJANAM ROY R/O C/O- RATAN DEY NILACHAL H. NO. 36 KALIPUR MALIGAON P.S.- BHARALUMUKH DIST.- KAMRUP(M) ASSAM PIN- 781011. 3:SHITAL RAI S/O MUNILAL RAI R/O SHEWA MONTHALI DIST.- VAISHALI BIHAR PIN- 841223. ------------ Advocate for : MR. R GOSWAMI Advocate for : MR. S CHAUHAN (R-1) appearing for DALIMI DEKA AND 2 ORS B BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA O R D E R Date : 07.01.2026. Heard Mr. P. Mazumder, learned counsel for the applicant/respondent No.1. Also heard Ms. P. Borthakur, learned counsel for the opposite party/appellant. This application is filed praying for a direction to the appellant i.e. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd., to deposit 50 % of the awarded amount, as per the Page No.# 3/3 judgment and award dated 27.10.2025, passed by the learned Member, MACT, Udalguri in MAC Case No.3/2017. It is submitted by Mr. P. Mazumder, learned counsel for the applicant/respondent No.1 that the appellant had already deposited 50% of the awarded amount before the Registry o 18.11.2025 and hence, they are not going to press the present Interlocutory Application. In view of the above submission, this Interlocutory Application stands disposed of as being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant