Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17273 (JHR)

RATAN MANDAL v. KISTO MANDAL

C.M.P./487/2024 · 2026-06-19

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:18028 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.487 of 2024 ------ 1. Ratan Mandal, son of Late Dhorai Mandal 2. Vijay Mandal, son of Late Dhorai Mandal 3. Dinesh Mandal, son of Late Dhorai Mandal 4. Upendra Mandal, son of Late Dhorai Mandal. All resident of Village Beltikari, P.O. & P.S. Mahagama, District Godda. … … Petitioners Versus Kisto Mandal, son of Late Turi Mandal, resident of Village Nima, P.O. & P.S. Balabadda (Meharma), District Godda. … … Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate For the O.P.(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah, Advocate ----- 08/ 19.06.2026 Heard the parties. 2. Learned counsel Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah, appears on behalf of the sole opposite party. 3. This Civil Misc. Petition has been preferred for restoration of Second Appeal No.438 of 2019, which was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 14.07.2022, for removing the surviving defects. 4. Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that no sooner the Second Appeal is restored to its original file, he will remove the surviving defects. 5. Learned counsel representing the opposite party does not oppose the aforesaid submission. 6. Considering the submission of learned counsel representing the petitioners, this Civil Misc. Petition is allowed. 2026:JHHC:18028 2 7. The Second Appeal No.438 of 2019, is restored to its original file with a condition that the defect, if any, is still not removed, the same shall be removed within four weeks, otherwise this order will not be given effect to. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 19th June, 2026 Prashant. Cp-2 Uploaded on 22.06.2026