RC,J C.C.No.911 of 2025 1 APHC010082662024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 911/2025 Between: 1. M/S VIKRAM DYE-CHEM (P) LTD, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR B RAMAGOPAL REDDY S/O LATE B SESHI REDDY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS OCC BUSINESS R/O FLAT NO 405 SILVER SPRINGS APARTMENTS MANGAMUR ROAD ONGOLE PRAKASAM DIST, A P. 2. M/S. VIPASANA CONSTRUCTIONS P LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS M V KRISHNA REDDY (DIED), S/O LATE M PEDDA CHENCHI REDDY AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS R/O PLOT NO 933 VIVEKANANDA NAGAR COLONY KUKATPALLY HYDERABAD. (P-2 M.V. KRISHNA REDDY DIED PER LR. P-3 ) 3. SMT. MALE PRABHAVATHI,, W/O. LATE M. VENKATA KRISHNA REDDY, AGED 70 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.3-5-43/8, PLOT NO.933, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR COLONY, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. A THAMEEM ANSARIYA IAS, Collector and District Magistrate, Prakasam Dsitrict, at Ongole ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may RC,J C.C.No.911 of 2025 2 be pleased to pleased to summon the respondent herein and punish him under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully, disobeyed and flouted the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No.21274/2018 dated 30-11-2022 (amended order dated 22-02-2023 in IA.No.1 of 2023), and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of 369 days in Re-presenting the CC.SR.No.6895 of 2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V R MACHAVARAM Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. K M KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following: RC,J C.C.No.911 of 2025 3 ORDER Sri V.R.Machavaram, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, has duly been complied with this Contempt Case can be closed. 2. In view of the above submission, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSETICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 31st March, 2026. RR