Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1727 (CHH)

CHATHURAM v. GENERAL DIRECTOR

WPS/3338/2023 · 2026-01-14

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:2555 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3338 of 2023 1 - Chathuram S/o Late Shri Rangila Ram Aged About 51 Years Aarakshk / G.D.K .Ao.Su. B. Ikai S.E.C.L. Bilaspur R/o Ward Kramank 05, Subhas Nagar Deepka, Jila Korba Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - General Director Kendriya -Aoudhogik Surakshabal Mukhayalay Blak No. 13, C.G.O. Complex Lodhiroad New Delhi 2 - Mahanirikshak Kendriya - Audhogik - Surkshabal - Madhychhetra Mukhayalay Bhilai, Jila Durg Chhattisgarh 3 - Up - Mahanirikshak Kendriya Audhogik Surakshabal - Ikai S.E.C.L. Bilaspur Jila - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Commandent Kendriya Audhogik Surkshabal Ikai S.E.C.L. Bilaspur Jila - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Sahayak - Commandent / Janch Adhikari Kendriya Audhogik Surkshabal Ikai S.E.C.L. Bilaspur Jila Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 6 - P. R. Khambadkar Nirikshak Kendriya Audhogik Surkshabal Ikai S.E.C.L. Bilaspur Jila - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Abdul Moin Khan, Advocate appearing on behalf of Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, C. G. C. Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI 2 (Hon'ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge) Order on Board 15/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that subsequent to the filing of the present writ petition, the departmental enquiry has been concluded and the petitioner has been visited with the punishment of compulsory retirement. Challenging the said order, the petitioner has filed a fresh writ petition bearing W.P.S. No. 4888 of 2024 before this Court, which is presently pending consideration. In view of the aforesaid subsequent developments, it is contended that the present writ petition has rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the above submission, the petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Shayna JUDGE