Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17262 (RAJ)

BRIJSUNDAR REGAR S/O DALCHAND v. SHRI R. VENKATESHWAR

CCP/194/2025 · 2026-02-10

Anil Kumar Upman, Sudesh Bansal

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:6256-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 194/2025 In D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.536/2024 1. Brijsundar Regar S/o Dalchand, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Dehit, Tehsil Talera, District Bundi, Rajasthan. 2. Puran Singh Rathore S/o Hem Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/ o V.p.o. Amarsar, Tehsil Bidasar, District Churu, Rajasthan. 3. Satya Jeet Yadav S/o Sajan Singh Yadav, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Milakpur, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 4. Suresh Kumar S/o Teja Ram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o V.p.o. Sankad, Tehsil Sanchore, District Sanchore, Rajasthan. 5. Ganesh Kumar Saini S/o Raju Lal Saini, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ward No. 02, Dhani Bewadi, Garhmora, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Shri R. Venkateshwar, Principal Secreetary, Animal Husbandry Department, Government Secretariat, State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Dr. Anand Sejra, Director, Department Of Animal Husbandry, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Dr. Bhag Chand Badhal, Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandry Department, Government Secretariat, State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG Mr. Prem Chand Dewanda HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 10/02/2026 1. In instant Civil Contempt Petition, disobedience of an interim stay order dated 10.09.2024 passed in DB Special Appeal Writ No.536/2024, has been alleged. [2026:RJ-JP:6256-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-194/2025] 2. Vide interim order dated 10.09.2024, this Court directed the respondents to maintain status quo in respect of vacancies of Livestock Assistant, fallen vacant due to cancellation of appointment of the appellants 3. Counsel for respondents, on the strength of reply to the contempt petition, pointed out that since final result of Livestock Assistant was revised on 01.03.2024 and in pursuance thereof, after cancellation of previous appointments, fresh appointments have already been made in the month of March 2024. As per revised result, on the date of passing the interim order dated 10.09.2024, only 22 vacant posts are available, which are still lying vacant. Specific details of all the vacant posts have been given out in Para Nos. 2 to 8 of the reply. 4. In view of the reply submitted by respondents, we do not find that respondents are guilty of committing disobedience of the interim stay order dated 10.09.2024, hence, no case of contempt of the order dated 10.09.2024 is made out. 5. Accordingly, the proceedings of instant contempt petition are closed and the contempt petition stands disposed of. Notices of contempt stand discharged. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/31