Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2026 DAILYLAW 1726 (RAJ)
UNION OF INDIA v. SMT. KALAWATI W/O LATE SHRI LEELURAM
CMA/1695/2021 · 2026-02-23
Uma Shanker Vyas
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1726 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1726 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:8210] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1695/2021 Union Of India, Through The General Manager, North Western Railway, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Appellant Versus
1. Smt. Kalawati W/o Late Shri Leeluram, Resident Of Village Parta, Post Parta, Tehsil Tohana, District Fatehabad (Haryana)
2. Vir Singh S/o Late Shri Leeluram, Resident Of Village Parta, Post Parta, Tehsil Tohana, District Fatehabad (Haryana)
3. Master Vakil Singh S/o Late Shri Leeluram, Resident Of Village Parta, Post Parta, Tehsil Tohana, District Fatehabad (Haryana) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Gaurav Jain, Adv. with Mr. Shrikant, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Shukla, Adv. Mr. Raghav Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shivam Sharma, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Sharma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 23/02/2026 vihykFkhZ@foi{kh Hkkjr la?k ¼vkxs ^^foi{kh** dgk tk;sxk½ dh vksj ls ;g vihy fo}ku jsyos nkok vf/kdj.k] t;iqj csap }kjk izdj.k la[;k&OA-II-22/2015 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 26-07-2021 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh] ftlds ek/;e ls e`rd yhywjke ds ifjtuksa dks dqy 8]00]000@&:i;s izfrdj 9 izfr'kr okf"kZd C;kt lfgr fnyk;s tkus dk vkns'k fn;k x;k gSA
[2026:RJ-JP:8210] (2 of 2) [CMA-1695/2021] fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ Hkkjr la?k dk ;g rdZ gS fd e`rd ?kVuk ds le; pyrh Vªsu ds [kkyh dksp esa p<+us dk iz;kl dj jgk Fkk] mldh Lo;a dh xyrh ls ;g nq?kZVuk gqbZ gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esas og dksbZ izfrdj jkf'k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gS vkSj bl vk/kkj ij vihyk/khu fu.kZ; vikLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ@nkosnkjksa dk fuosnu gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa Dyse ;kfpdk jsyos nkok vf/kdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1987 dh /kkjk 16 ds rgr izLrqr dh xbZ gS rFkk ,sls ekeyksa esa e`rd@vkgr dk ln~Hkkfod jsy ;k=h gksuk o vfiz; vFkok vuisf{kr ?kVuk gksuk gh i;kZIr gS] e`rd vFkok vkgr dh ykijokgh dk fcanq vlaxr gSA vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa U;kf;d fu.kZ; Union of India Vs. Prabhakaran Vijaya Kumar & Ors. 2008 (9) SCC 527 izLrqr fd;k] ftldk llEeku voyksdu fd;kA orZeku ekeys esa nkosnkjksa dh lk{; rFkk Lo;a jsy e.My izca/kd dh fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj e`rd rRle; ln~Hkkfod jsy ;k=h Fkk] ysfdu Hkkjr la?k dk ;g cpko gS fd pyrh Vªsu esa e`rd }kjk p<+us ds iz;kl ds nkSjku ;g nq?kZVuk gqbZ gS ysfdus ,sls ekeyksa esa Hkh U;kf;d Union of India Vs. Prabhakaran Vijaya Kumar & Ors.
¼iwoksZDr½ esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj fu/kkZfjr izfrdj nkosnkj izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gS] ,slh fLFkfr esa fo}ku fopkj.k vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; iw.kZr% rF;ksa o fof/k ds vuq:i gS] vr% ;g fu.kZ; iq"V gksus rFkk vihy [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA ifj.kker% vihykFkhZ Hkkjr la?k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vihy [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk vihyk/khu fu.kZ; fnukad 26-07-2021 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA LFkxu vkosnu o vU; vkosnu] ;fn dksbZ yafcr gksa] rks os Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;s tkrs gSaA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DINESH KUMAWAT /33