[2026:RJ-JP:3146] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1514/2025 1. Pappi S/o. Shersingh, Resident Of Bhondaganv, Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj. 2. Harkesh S/o. Sardar, Resident Of Bhondaganv, Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj. 3. Mukesh S/o. Hargyan, Resident Of Bhondaganv, Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj. 4. Pushkar S/o. Gyani, Resident Of Bhondaganv, Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj. 5. Banvari S/o. Madho, Resident Of Bhondaganv, Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj. 6. Raju S/o. Namalum, Resident Of Nawar, Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Harprasad S/o. Dharma, Resident Of Sita, Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj.) 3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Veerendra Singh & Ms. Manisha Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Ms. Megha Sharma with Mr. Mitsu Choudhary for Mr. Tushar Sharma Ms. Praveshika Singh for Mr. V.D. Gathala HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 21/01/2026 1. Parties are present in person and they have duly been identified by their respective counsel. [2026:RJ-JP:3146] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-1514/2025] 2. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.32/2025 registered at Police Station Weir, District Bharatpur for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 351(3), 307 & 126(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that in the aforesaid FIR, investigation is going on and as per factual report, offence under Section 307 BNS (382 IPC) has been found proved against the petitioners. It is submitted that during the pendency of this petition, parties have entered into compromise and they have resolved their dispute amicably. It is submitted that except the present case, there is one criminal antecedent against the petitioners. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. Under instructions of complainant as well as victim, learned counsel submits that impugned FIR may be quashed. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the [2026:RJ-JP:3146] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-1514/2025] case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No. 32/2025 registered at Police Station Weir, District Bharatpur is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /355