Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010068852021 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C)/7249/2018 NATWAR LAL AGARWALA AND ANR. (EX PRESIDENT OF ASSAM DRUG DEALERS ASSOCIATION NOW PATRON OF PHARMACIST FORUM OF ASSAM) S/O- LT RAMNIWAS AGARWALA R/O- FRONTIER DRUG HOUSE JASWANTA ROAD PANBAZAR GHY-1 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 2: MD. ABEDULLA (FORMER EC MEMBER OF ASSAM DRUG DEALERS ASSOCIATION NOW PATRON OF PHARMACIST FORUM OF ASSAM) S/O- LT SAFI ULLAH R/O- BISHP PLAZA COL. J.ALI ROAD LAKHTOKIA GHY-1 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM VERSUS THE REGISTRAR OF FIRMS AND SOCIETIES AND 4 ORS. REP. BY THE REGISTRAR FIRMS AND SOCIETIES ASSAM H.NO. 1 4TH FLOOR BANPHOOL NAGAR PATH BELTOLA GHY- 6 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-6 3:ASSAM DRUG DEALERS ASSOCIATION REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECY. HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 4TH FLOOR CITY TOWER S.C.GOSWAMI ROAD PANBAZAR GHY-1 4:THE PRESIDENT ASSAM DRUG DEALERS ASSOCIATION HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 4TH FLOOR CITY TOWER S.C.GOSWAMI ROAD PANBAZAR GHY-1 5:THE GENERAL SECY. ASSAM DRUG DEALERS ASSOCIATION HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 4TH FLOOR CITY TOWER S.C.GOSWAMI ROAD PANBAZAR GHY-1 ------------ Advocate for : MR. J ROY Advocate for : SC FINANCE DEPTT. appearing for THE REGISTRAR OF FIRMS AND SOCIETIES AND 4 ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 05.01.2026 Heard Mr. S. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. H. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1 and 2 and Mr. M. Das, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No.3, 4 and 5. The simple prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to dispose of the complaint dated 29.07.2017 against the Assam Drug Dealers Association filed by the petitioner. Page No.# 3/3 During the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent authorities vide order dated 11.09.2019 have disposed of the said complaint, which has been put to challenge in WP(C) 2685/2021. In view of the above, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant