Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17259 (CAL)

TAPAN KANTI BHATTACHARYA v. STATE OF W B & ORS

WP.ST/196/2012 · 2026-03-12

Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit Biswas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ct. No.4 D/L 12.03.2026 (Naba) 05 W.P.S.T. 196 of 2012 Sri Tapan Kanti Bhattacharya Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, ld. A.G.P., Ms. Sangeeta Roy ...for the State 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. State is represented. 3. We find from the records that on earlier occasion nobody was present to represent the petitioner. 4. Apparently, the petitioner has lost interest to proceed with the case. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default. 6. Connected application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)