Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17258 (CAL)

PURNIMA BHUNIA v. DHRITIMAN SARKAR,BEING THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,PASCHIM MEDINIPURAND ANR

CPAN/1374/2024 · 2026-02-04

Jay Sengupta

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

04.02.2026 Ct. No. 28 Sl. No. 259 tbsr CPAN 1374 of 2024 In WPA 24633 of 2023 PURNIMA BHUNIA VS DHRITIMAN SARKAR AND ANR Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee, (Ld. Jr. Govt. Adv.) Ms. Munmun Ganguly ….for the alleged contemnors No one appears on behalf of the applicant although the alleged contemnors are represented. Even on the last occasion, i.e. on 03.12.2025, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant when the matter was called on for hearing. Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance. (Jay Sengupta, J.)