Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17256 (JHR)

SHIVAM KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5473/2026 · 2026-06-19

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:17957] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5473 of 2026 ------ Shivam Kumar, aged about 24 years, son of Dinesh Prasad Sah, resident of Village Barmasia, P.O. B. Deoghar, P.S. Deoghar Town, District Deoghar (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhanshu Kr. Deo, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-19-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No.58 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and 25(1-B)(a), 26, 27, 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has looted cash of Rs.2,000/- and Galaxy Mobile of the driver of Tata Magic vehicle who was transporting refrigerators in his vehicle. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and he has not been put under T.I. Parade as has been mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.04.2026 as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 15.06.2026 passed in B.A. No.5294 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No.58 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 19.06.2026 Saroj/