Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17254 (JHR)

RAHUL CHANDRAVANSHI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./1763/2026 · 2026-06-19

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:18006 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 1763 of 2026 Rahul Chandravanshi son of Raj Kumar Singh … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjana Kumari, Advocate For the Opp. Party : None --- 04/19.06.2026 This petition has been filed for modification of paragraph 6(i) of the order dated 20.04.2026 passed in B.A. No. 2405 of 2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the pairvikar of the petitioner in the bail application is the pairvikar of the petitioner in this petition also. However, the pairvikar is unable to furnish the surety as he does not have any asset. She submits that as per the bail order, the other bailors have to a close relative. The learned counsel submits that the order may be modified and appropriate order be passed so that any other close relative of the petitioner may become the pairvikar of the petitioner. 3. Nobody appears on behalf of the State. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, paragraph 6(i) of the order dated 20.04.2026 passed in B.A. No. 2405 of 2026 is modified as follows: - “Paragraph no. 6(i) of the order dated 20.04.2026 passed in B.A. No. 2405 of 2026 be read as: - “The bailor would be the close relative of the petitioner.” 5. This petition is disposed of. 6. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 19.06.2026 Uploaded on 20.06.2026 Binit/