Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010242962024 2026:GAU-AS:237 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3050/2024 AJGAR ALI AND 12 ORS. S/O AZAD ALI, R/O RIVER BLOCK NO.10 NC, PS AND DISTRICT DHUBRI, ASSAM 2: JABBAR ALI S/O MOKRAM ALI R/O RIVER BLOCK NO.10 NC PS AND DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM 3: SAYED ALI S/O MOGAR KHAN R/O RIVER BLOCK NO.10 NC PS AND DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM 4: ATOWAR ALI S/O AJIT MONDAL R/O MAJERCHAR PS AND DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM 5: ABDUL SALAM S/O ANSAR ALI R/O RIVER BLOCK NO.10 NC PS AND DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM 6: SAHJAMAL SHEIKH S/O MOKRAM ALI Page No.# 2/4 R/O RIVER BLOCK NO.10 NC PS AND DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM 7: SAHJAHAN ALI S/O MOKRAM ALI R/O RIVER BLOCK NO.10 NC PS AND DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM 8: SAH ALOM SHEIKH S/O MOKRAM ALI R/O RIVER BLOCK NO.10 NC PS AND DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM 9: SHANA ULLAH S/O MOKRAM ALI R/O MAJERCHAR PS AND DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM 10: ABBAS ALI @ SHANTI S/O BIDDUS ALI R/O RIVER BLOCK NO.10 NC PS AND DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM 11: ISMAIL SHEIKH S/O ENTAJ ALI R/O RIVER BLOCK NO.10 NC PS AND DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM 12: ABU TALEB @ TALEB ALI S/O MOKRAM ALI R/O RIVER BLOCK NO.10 NC PS AND DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM 13: AJIT ALI S/O ABDUL JALIL Page No.# 3/4 R/O RIVER BLOCK NO.10 NC PS AND DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S ISLAM, MR A HAWARI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS O R D E R 07.01.2026 Heard Mr. S. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State respondent. 2. This petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioners, namely, (i) Ajgar Ali, (ii) Jabber Ali, (iii) Sayed Ali, (iv) Atowar Ali, (v) Abdul Salam, (vi) Sahjamal Sheikh, (vii) Sahjahan Ali, (viii) Sah Alom Sheikh, (ix) Shana Ullah Sheikh, (x) Abbas Ali, (xi) Ismail Sheikh, (xii) Abu Taleb @ Taleb Ali, and (xiii) Ajit Ali, praying for grant of bail in connection with Dhubri P.S. Case No. 397/2024, under Sections 61(2) (a)/189(3)/126(2)/109(1)/304(2) of BNS. 3. 3. The gist of the allegations in the FIR is that there was a dispute with the informant site with regard to running over Ferryghat, which was earlier settled Page No.# 4/4 with the help of local Goanburah. Subsequently, on the date of the incident i.e. 30. 10.2024 in the morning the accused persons with planning to attacked them with dao stick etc., causing injury. 4. Mr. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the narration in the FIR is exaggerated and that there was a dispute and also cross FIR and the injuries, if any, are simple in nature. 5. The case is already charge-sheeted. Scanned record has been received. The petitioners were granted interim bail on 20.11.2024, pursuant to which they are stated to have appeared before the I/O, during investigation. 7. In the given facts and circumstances, perhaps there is no need to cancel the interim bail and accordingly, the interim bail granted to the aforesaid petitioners vide order dated 20.11.2024 is hereby made absolute, subject, of course, to the following conditions:- (i) They shall be available for the trial (ii) They shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence. (iii) They shall not misuse their liberty to commit any offences or any illegal activities. 8. Violation of any bail condition will entail cancellation of the bail. 9. Accordingly, this instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed and disposed of. 10. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant