Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17247 (GAU)

AKCHID ALI AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/2540/2025 · 2026-01-07

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010236922025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2540/2025 AKCHID ALI AND ANR SON OF AKKASH ALI VILL AND P.O. BHANGNAMARI, P.S. BHANGNAMARI DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM 2: NURMAL HUSSAIN S/O KADDUS ALI VILL AND P.O. BHANGNAMRI P.S. BHANGNAMARI DIST. NALBARI ASSAM PHONE NO. 8403896494 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. SURAJIT DUTTA, MR J H SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 08.01.2026 Heard Mr. J H Saikia, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Page No.# 2/2 K.K. Das, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. By filing this application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 the petitioners, namely, 1. Akchid Ali & 2. Nurmal Hussain have prayed for anticipatory bail, apprehending arrest in connection with Bhangnamari P.S. Case No. 13/2025 under Sections 318(4)/319(2)/308(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. 3. Mr. Das has submitted that pursuant to the interim order granted by this Court, the petitioners, namely, 1. Akchid Ali & 2. Nurmal Hussain have appeared before the Police Investigating Officer and their statements have already been recorded. 4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides. 5. Since the petitioners have been co-operating with the Police Investigating Officer, this Court is of the opinion that their custodial detention is not required for the purpose of investigation of the case. 6. Accordingly, the interim order granted by this Court on 06.11.2025 in favour of the above-named petitioners is hereby made absolute. 7. This AB stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant