Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010245122025
2026:GAU-AS:79
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3604/2025 DEBAKANTA GOGOI S/O- RATNESWAR GOGOI, R/O- NO. 3 RANGA BANANI GAON, P.O. AND P.S.
TINGKHANG, DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN- 786612. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI. 2:OIL INDIA LIMITED REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR DULIAJAN DIST- DULIAJAN DIST- DIBRUGARH PIN-786602 3:GENERAL MANAGER- SECURITY OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN BRANCH PIN- 786602. 4:GENERAL MANAGER (EMPLOYEE RELATION) OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN BRANCH PIN- 786602. 5:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER SECURITY OIL INDIA LIMITED DULAIAJAN BRANCH
Page No.# 2/4 PIN-786602 6:SENIOR SECURITY OFFICER CUM ENQUIRY OFFICER OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN BRANCH PIN- 786602 Linked Case : WP(C)/4587/2025 DEBAKANTA GOGOI S/O- RATNESWAR GOGOI R/O- NO. 3 RANGA BANANI GAON P.O. AND P.S. TINGKHANG DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN- 786612. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS SHASTRI BHAWAN NEW DELHI. 2:GENERAL MANAGER- SECURITY OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN BRANCH PIN- 786602. 3:GENERAL MANAGER (EMPLOYEE RELATION) OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN BRANCH PIN- 786602. 4:SENIOR SECURITY OFFICER CUM ENQUIRY OFFICER OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN BRANCH PIN- 786602. 5:OIL INDIA LIMITED REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR DULIAJAN DIST- DULIAJAN DIST- DIBRUGARH
Page No.# 3/4 PIN-786602 6:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER SECURITY OIL INDIA LIMITED DULAIAJAN BRANCH PIN-786602
For the petitioner (s) : Mr. A. Khanikar, Advocate
For the respondent (s) : Mr. K. Mazumdar, Advocate
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R
05.01.2026
Heard Mr. A. Khanikar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant. Mr. K. Mazumdar, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent. 2. This is an application seeking amendment of the prayer portion of the accompanying writ petition. 3. Taking into account that although notice has already been issued in the accompanying writ petition and Mr. K. Mazumdar, the learned counsel, has duly represented the respondents, it is the opinion of this Court that the relief sought to be inserted by way of the present application is required to be allowed. 4. Accordingly, the instant I.A. stands allowed thereby
Page No.# 4/4 permitting the applicant to amend the prayer portion of the accompanying writ petition. 5.
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is granted seven (7) days time to file the amended writ petition. 6. Accordingly, the I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant