[2026:JHHC:17943] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5208 of 2026 ------ Sairun Bibi, aged about 47 years, Wife of Jasmuddin Ansari, resident of Vill. – Babhandih, P.O.- Nawadih, P.S.- Ramgarh, District- Palamau, Jharkhand - 822110 .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhanshu Shekhar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-19-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.19 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 435 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 118(2), 109(1), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. This is the second journey of the petitioner with the prayer for regular bail. Earlier the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 12.03.2026 passed in B.A. No.1747 of 2026. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, committed murder of the mother of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted by drawing attention of this Court to the confessional statement of the co-accused Naushad Ansari that it is Naushad Ansari who committed murder of the deceased. It is also submitted that the petitioner is a female. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only because she is step-mother of the informant. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.08.2025 as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.19 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 435 of 2025 with the condition that she will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish her mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that she will not change her mobile number during the trial of the case and she will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 19.06.2026 Saroj/