[2026:RJ-JP:1199] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3678/2020 Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Gopichand Jain, Aged About 61 Years, R/o A-64, Sumer Nagar Vistar, In Front Of Heera Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur. 2. The General Manager Deluxe Depot, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur. 3. Joint Managing Director (Finance-Pension), Head Office, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Rashmi Jain For Respondent(s) : Ms. Devyani Rathore HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 12/01/2026 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and impugned order dated 09.09.2019 may kindly be set aside and further respondents may kindly be directed to make the payment to the petitioner as a GPF account holder employee and grant the monthly pension with all consequential benefits with 12% rate of interest. In the interest of justice Exemplary cost may kindly be imposed upon the responsible officers and employees who deprive the petitioner from G.P.F. amount and his pensionary benefits. Any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” [2026:RJ-JP:1199] (2 of 3) [CW-3678/2020] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised by the petitioner has already been considered and decided by a Co-ordinate Bench in case of Dhanna Lal Jat Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12854/2017 vide order dated 01.12.2021 and same is approved by the Division Bench. She further submits that even SLP filed by RSRTC was dismissed by Hon’ble Supreme Court on 21.10.2025. She submits that the petitioner is ready to deposit CPF amount and his option be considered for GPF account. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents while referring order dated 27.04.2023 in S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No.89/2022 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12854/2017 (Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and Ors. Vs. Dhanna Lal) submits that RSRTC is entitled for interest @ 9% per annum on the amount used by the petitioner. 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and also considering the judgment as referred by learned counsel for both the parties, the writ petition is hereby allowed in light of judgment dated 01.12.2021 in case of Dhanna Lal Jat Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and Ors. (supra). The respondents are directed to grant benefit of GPF scheme and to grant the GPF Pension to the petitioner with effect from the date of his superannuation. The petitioner is directed to refund the full amount received by him under the CPF Scheme with interest @ 9% per annum or with modified interest, if any, reduced by the Government of Rajasthan. [2026:RJ-JP:1199] (3 of 3) [CW-3678/2020] 5. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed with pending application, if any. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/52