( 2026:JHHC:17840 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 964 of 2026 ------ 1. Nilam Garva @ Neelam, aged about 28 years, wife of Dewanand, daughter of Prabhudayal Garva 2. Prabhudayal Garva @ Prabhudayal, aged about 50 years, son of Gopal Lal 3. Babita, aged about 26 years, wife of Prabhudayal Garva 4. Dipika Garva, aged about 25 years, daughter of Prabhudayal Garva 5. Nikita Garva, aged about 25 years, daughter of Prabhudayal Garva All are resident of F/3 X-93 Anshal, Susant City, Kalwar Road, Machwa, P.O.-Bhude Ka Bas, P.S.-Kalwar, Dist.- Jaipur (West), State-Rajasthan … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Dewanand, aged about 33 years, son of Sultan Singh, permanent resident of Village-Nathpura, P.O.- Bhude Ka Bas, P.S.-Malsisar, Dist.-Jhunjhunu, State-Rajasthan, Present Address is Village-Tapin, 45 No. Kanta, P.O. & P.S.-Charhi, Dist.-Hazaribag … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Ms. Priya Shrestha, Spl. P.P. For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Amartya Choubey, Advocate ------ Order No.03 Dated- 19.06.2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioner for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 457 of 2026 to its original file. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Cr.M.P. No. 457 of 2026 was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order of filing requisites. It is next submitted that due to mistake on the part of the Advocate, the said requisites could not be filed within the stipulated time and the same resulted in dismissal of Cr.M.P. No. 457 of 2026. It is further submitted that non-compliance of peremptory order was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is next submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No. 457 of 2026 and unless Cr.M.P. No. 457 of 2026 is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that Cr.M.P. No. 457 of 2026 be restored to its original file. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Cr.M.P. No. 457 of 2026 is restored to its original file to the stage at which, it was before its dismissal. List Cr.M.P. No. 457 of 2026 under the appropriate heading before the appropriate bench after a week. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 19.06.2026 Gunjan-