APHC010079252026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION No: 1225/2026 Between: AMBATI RAMBABU, S/O LATE SRI A.V.S.R ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, EX.MINISTER, R/O.D.NO.4-20-28/2, 1LANE,SIDDHARTHA NAGAR, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,RAJUPALEM POLICE STATION,GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. ANUMOLU JAYA RAM, S/O.DHANA KOTESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RAGHURAM NAGAR, SATTENAPALLI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. SUDHARSANA REDDY J Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, by the Petitioner / Accused seeking to quash the proceedings against him in Crime No.65 of 2019 on the file of Rajupalem Police Station, Guntur District for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 188, 452, 342, 323, 324, 427 and 307 read with 149, 120B IPC and Sections 132(1) and 135(1) of Representation of People Act, 1951. 2 2. Heard Sri J.Sudarsana Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Sri M.Lakshmi Narayana, learned Public Prosecutor. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor brought to the notice of the Court that on 03.02.2026 the charge sheet filed in the present crime was returned with the following objections. “Anticipatory Bail granted for A10, A11, !3 to A17, A20 to A27, A9 to A33, A35 to A48 as per order of the Hon’ble Spl.Sessions Judge-cum-IV Addl.Sessions Judge, Guntur in Crl.M.P.85/2020, dated 28.1.2020, but not surrendered before this Court. Anticipatory Bail granted for A12, A18, A19, A28 and A34 as per order of the Hon’ble High Court of AP, Amaravathi in Crl.Petition No.1580/2020, dated 19.4.2020, but not surrendered before this Court. What steps taken by the IO in this regard has to be explained. Hence, returned.” 4. Learned Public Prosecutor also brought to the notice of the Court that the investigation in the present crime has been completed, charge sheet has also been filed deleting the name of the Petitioner herein by giving notice to the De facto complainant. It is further submitted that, only on the apprehension that the Investigating Officer may seek for P.T warrant against the Petitioner, this petition is filed. In fact the name of the Petitioner was deleted during the course of investigation. 5. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the said submissions, the petition may be disposed of. 6. Recording the same, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stands closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:17.02.2026 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.1225 of 2026 Dt.17.02.2026 Dinesh