Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17231 (AP)

CHAKALI MADHU v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/4584/2026 · 2026-02-17

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010079592026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4584/2026 Between: 1. CHAKALI MADHU, S/O. CHAKALI PAKKIRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,5-53,RAHIMANPURAM, GUTUPALLE, BETHAMCHERIA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. CHAKALI NAGA MADDILETI,, S/O. CHAKALI PAKKIRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,5-53, RAHIMANPURAM, GUTUPALLE, BETHAMCHERIA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT, OF MINORITY AND SOCIAL WELFARE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI - 522 503. 2. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, A.P. STATE WAQF BOARD, 4TH FLOOR IN GEDAGAR BUILDING KALESWARA RAO MARKET, TARAPET, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.520001. 3. THE AUDIT INSPECTER, A.P. STATE WAQF BOARD, NANDYALA DISTRICT -518501. 4. STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT, OF STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI - 522 503. 5. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPT. NANDAYALA DISTRICT-518501. 2 6. THE SUB REGISTRAR, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPT. BETHAMCHERIA DIVISION NANDAYALA DISTRICT (A.P.) - 518501. 7. STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT, OF REVENUE, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI - 522 503. 8. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDAYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.518501. 9. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DHONE DIVISION, DHONE, NANDAYALA DISTRICT., AMDHRA PRADESH-518501. 10. THE TAHSILDAR, BETAMCHERLA MANDAL BETAMCHERLA, NANDAYALA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH.518501. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a necessary Writ Order/direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring that, the inaction of respondent no.2, in pursuance of the ' deletion order' (i.e.) order dated 01.04.2024, bearing R.C.No. BI/2103/24 issued by respondent No. 8 to respondent No. 2, including, respondent no.2 taking necessary steps to ensure deletion of our agricultural 'land' (i.e.) being belongs to petitioner no.1 herein being S.No. 153 an extent of Ac.1.56 cents, S.No. 226/1 an extent of 2.25 cents of Gutupalli Village, Betamcherla Mandal, Nandyala District and land belongs to petitioner no.2 herein being S.No. 153 an extent of Ac.1.50 cents, S.No. 226/1 an extent of 2.25 cents of Gutupalli Village, Betamcherla Mandal, Nandyala District, from the prohibitory list maintained by respondent no. 5 and 6, under Section 22-A (1) (c) of the Registration Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the 'registration act') as illegal, arbitrary, capricious, fraudulent, vexatious, malafide, violative of Section 22-A of the 'registration act' and other allied provisions of the 'registration act', violative of the provisions of the other related statutes, violative of our constitutional rights, more particularly Article 19(1)(g),21 and 300A of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents, more particularly respondent no.2, to immediately initiate further action, in pursuance of the 'deletion order',as per law,including removal of our 'land' from the 'prohibitory list', initiate disciplinary proceedings against respondent no. 2, etc., or any other action as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of our case and in the interests of justice, IA NO: 1 OF 2026 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondent no. 6 to receive and register any conveyance deed that may be executed by us vis-a-vis our ‘land’ (i.e.) belongs to petitioner no.1 herein being S.No. 153 an extent of Ac.1.56 cents, S.No. 226/1 an extent of 2.25 cents of Gutupalli Village, Betamcherla Mandal, Nandyala District and land belongs to petitioner no.2 herein being S.No. 153 an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents, S.No. 226/1 an extent of 2.25 cents of Gutupalli Village, Betamcherla Mandal, Nandyala District, during the pendency of this writ petition, in the interest of justice, else, the petitioners shall suffer irreparable loss and injury. IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents, more particularly respondent no. 2 to submit the basis on which our ‘land’ (i.e.) belongs to petitioner no.1 herein being S.No. 153 an extent of Ac.1.56 cents, S.No. 226/1 an extent of 2.25 cents of Gutupalli Village, Betamcherla Mandal, Nandyala District and land belongs to petitioner no.2 herein being S.No. 153 an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents, S.No. 226/1 an extent of 2.25 cents of Gutupalli Village, Betamcherla Mandal, Nandyala District, was treated as land belonging to respondent no.2 and how it came to be included in the ‘prohibitory list’, in the interest of justice, else, the petitioners shall suffer irreparable loss and injury. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M S R SASHI BHUSHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 3. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.4584 OF 2026 ORDER: Sri Kadiyam Neelakanteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing for sometime, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 18.02.2026 KBN 5 11 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.4584 of 2026 Date: 18.02.2026 KBN