GAURILAL S/O LATE SHRI CHUNNILAL v. KANTA PRASAD @ RUKMANI S/O SHRI JAGANNATH ADOPTED SON OF NANAGRAM
CW/4442/2023 · 2026-02-10
Bipin Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17230 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17230 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:6156] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4442/2023
1. Gaurilal S/o Late Shri Chunnilal, Aged About 60 Years, R/ o Gram Ranapada, Tehsil Mandawar, District Dausa (Raj.).
2. Girraj S/o Late Shri Chunnilal, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Gram Ranapada, Tehsil Mandawar, District Dausa (Raj.).
3. Shivlal S/o Late Shri Chunnilal, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Gram Ranapada, Tehsil Mandawar, District Dausa (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus
1. Kanta Prasad @ Rukmani S/o Shri Jagannath Adopted Son Of Nanagram, R/o Gram Kolana, Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa (Raj.).
2. General Public, As Whole
3. Jyoti Prasad Gupta S/o Shri Jagannath Adopted Son Of Nanagram, R/o Gram Kolana, Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa (Raj.).
4. Subhash Chand Gupta S/o Late Shri Kanhaiya Lal, R/o House No. 373, Gayatri Nagar-A, Maharani Farm, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
5. Rajkumar S/o Late Shri Kanhaiya Lal, Resident Of C/o Mahalakshmi Motor And Company 290, Guruprasad Complex, Pune-11 (Maha.).
6. Prakash Chand S/o Late Shri Kanhaiya Lal, Resident Of C/o Mahalakshmi Motor And Company 290, Guruprasad Complex, Pune-11 (Maha.).
7. Chandra Shekar Gupta S/o Late Shri Kanhaiya Lal, Resident Of C/o Mahalakshmi Motor And Company 290, Guruprasad Complex, Pune-11 (Maha.).
8. Rajesh Gupta S/o Late Shri Kanhaiya Lal, Resident Of C/o Mahalakshmi Motor And Company 290, Guruprasad Complex, Pune-11 (Maha.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Manisha Agarwal & Mr. Heeralal Prajapati on behalf of Mr. Anshuman Saxena For Respondent(s) : Mr. H.K. Chaturvedi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 10/02/2026
[2026:RJ-JP:6156] (2 of 2) [CW-4442/2023]
1. Both the parties are in agreement that the suit from which the present writ petition arises has been withdrawn and thus, the present writ petition has rendered infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the present Civil Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
3. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(BIPIN GUPTA),J MAHIMA/20