Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1723 (ALL)

SMT. RASHMI v. SRI RUKAM PAL SINGH

A227/6854/2026 · 2026-05-17

Vikas Budhwar

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6854 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard. 2. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices are not being issued to the respondents. 3. The solitary relief claimed in the present writ petition is for a direction to the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.), Shikohabad, Firozabad to decide 6C-2 application under order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C. in Original Suit No.308 of 2024 (Smt. Rashmi Vs. Rukam Pal Singh) within short stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 4. Learned counsel prayed that the said application may be decided, expeditiously. 5. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 6. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.), Shikohabad, Firozabad to decide 6C-2 application under order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C. in Original Suit No.308 of 2024 (Smt. Rashmi Vs. Rukam Pal Singh), expeditiously, without granting any unnecessary adjournments, subject to legal impediment. May 18, 2026 N.S.Rathour Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhanshu Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Smt. Rashmi .....Petitioner(s) Sri Rukam Pal Singh .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad