Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17228 (MAD)

Muthusubramaniam v. State represented by, The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/9365/2026 · 2026-04-15

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 9365 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 9365 of 2026 1. Muthusubramaniam S/0. Arumugam, No 1/59, Chinnampalayam, Pollachi, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu- 642 001. 2. Kathir No 289, Marappettai Street,Pollachi,Coimbatore,Tamil Nadu 642 001. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Mahalingapuram Police Station, Coimbatore District. (Crime No. 63 of 2026) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest concerned in Crime No. 63 of 2026, on the file of the Inspector of Police, Mahalingapuram Police Station, Coimbatore District, on such terms and conditions and as this Honble court may deem fit and proper and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.ARUL SELVAN S NO APPEARANCE For Respondent(s): MR.P.DHILEEPAN, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL SIDE) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9365 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 109 of BNS, in Crime No.63 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant with a knife. Hence, the case. 3. There is no representation for the petitioner. 4. From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) it is seen that the second petitioner has already been arrested and released on bail. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous in respect of second petitioner. 5. As far as the first petitioner is concerned, he is a history sheeter with five previous cases. Considering the same, this Court is of the firm view that if the petitioner is enlarged on anticipatory bail, he would be emboldened to commit similar offences in future. Hence, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the first petitioner on anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9365 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed in respect of first petitioner. 15-04-2026 DRL To 1.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 2.The Inspector of Police, Mahalingapuram Police Station, Coimbatore District. (Crime No. 63 of 2026) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9365 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 9365 of 2026 15-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis