PRALHAD S/O KATUJI PATRE v. BRAMHAPURI KRISHI UTAPANNA BAZAR SAMITI, THR. PRESIDENT, AND ORS.
CAW/2538/2026 · 2026-10-09
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17219 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17219 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 97cawinwp7933.2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 2538 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7933 OF 2026 (Pralhad s/o Katuji Patre Vs. Bramhapuri Krishi Utapanna Bazar Samiti Bramhapuri and ors) AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 2545 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7991 OF 2026 (Vilas S/o Manohar Tupat Vs. Bramhapuri Krishi Utapanna Bazar Samiti and ors) __________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders __________________________________________________________________________________________ Ms. K.G. Badani, Adv h/f Mr. D.V. Mahajan, Advocate for petitioner. Ms. N.S. Autkar, AGP for respondents/State.
CORAM : RAJNISH R. VYAS, J. DATE
: 09/10/2026
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant.
2. Since, the application is for amendment in the petition where notices are yet to be issued, the application is allowed. Necessary amendment be carried out forthwith. The application is disposed of.
WRIT PETITION NO. 7933 OF 2026 and WRIT PETITION NO. 7991 OF 2026 Heard.
2. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 20.11.2026.
3. The learned AGP waives notice for respondent Nos. 3 and 4/State.
4. In addition to regular mode, the petitioner is permitted to serve the remaining respondents by private mode including RPAD.
(RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.) Belkhede Signed by: Mr. R. S. Belkhede Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 12/10/2026 12:27:36