SHRI JASWANT CHOUDHARY SON OF SHRI RIKHABCHAND CHOUDHARY v. SHRI VINOD KUMAR SON OF SHRI SOHANLAL JI SHRISHRIMAL
CW/5590/2025 · 2026-02-10
Bipin Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17217 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17217 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:6178] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5590/2025 Shri Jaswant Choudhary Son Of Shri Rikhabchand Choudhary, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of Outside Mewadi Gate, Munot Nagar, Beawar (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner/Plaintiff Versus
1. Shri Vinod Kumar Son Of Shri Sohanlal Ji Shrishrimal, (Since Deceased) Through Legal Heirs- 1/1. Shri Aman Son Of Late Shri Vinod, Resident Of Fateh Nagar, Near Ramnagar Colony, Outside Mewari Gate, Beawar. 1/2. Neha Daughter Of Late Shri Vinod, Resident Of Fateh Nagar, Near Ramnagar Colony, Outside Mewari Gate, Beawar. 1/3. Lucky Son Of Late Shri Vinod, Resident Of Fateh Nagar, Near Ramnagar Colony, Outside Mewari Gate, Beawar. 1/4. Antima Daughter Of Late Shri Vinod, Resident Of Fateh Nagar, Near Ramnagar Colony, Outside Mewari Gate, Beawar. 1/5. Shakuntla Wife Of Late Shri Vinod, Resident Of Fateh Nagar, Near Ramnagar Colony, Outside Mewari Gate, Beawar. 2. Shri Bhagchand S/o Shri Sohan Lal Ji Shrishrimal, Resident Of Near Samta Bhawan, Khatikant Hataie Road, Beawar (Rajasthan), Self And In Capacity Of Legal Representative Of Smt. Shanti Devi, Defendant No. 3. 3. Smt. Shanti Devi Wife Of Shri Sohan Lal Ji Shrishrimal, (Since Deceased) Through Legal Representatives - 3/1. Shri Vinod Shrishrimal Son Of Late Shri Sohan Lal Ji Shrishrimal, (Since Deceased) 3/1/1. Shri Aman Son Of Late Shri Vinod, Age Adult, Resident Of Fateh Nagar, Near Ramnagar Colony, Outside Mewari Gate, Beawar. 3/1/2. Neha Daughter Of Late Shri Vinod, Age Adult, Resident Of Fateh Nagar, Near Ramnagar Colony, Outside Mewari Gate, Beawar. [2026:RJ-JP:6178] (2 of 3) [CW-5590/2025] 3/1/3. Lucky Son Of Late Shri Vinod, Age Adult, Resident Of Fateh Nagar, Near Ramnagar Colony, Outside Mewari Gate, Beawar. 3/1/4. Antima Daughter Of Late Shri Vinod, Age Adult, Resident Of Fateh Nagar, Near Ramnagar Colony, Outside Mewari Gate, Beawar. 3/1/5. Shakuntla Wife Of Late Shri Vinod, Age Adult, Resident Of Fateh Nagar, Near Ramnagar Colony, Outside Mewari Gate, Beawar. 3/2. Shri Bhagchand Shrishrimal Son Of Late Shri Sohan Lal Ji Shrishrimal, Resident Of Near Samta Bhawan, Khatikan Hathoi Road, Beawar District Ajmer At Present District Beawar (Rajasthan) 3/3. Shri Sushil Shrishrimal Son Of Late Shri Sohan Lal Ji Shrishrimal, Resident Of Near Samta Bhawan, Khatikan Hathoi Road, Beawar District Ajmer At Present District Beawar (Rajasthan) 3/4.
Smt. Saroj Devi Wife Of Shri Dinesh Sankhala Daughter Of Late Shri Sohan Lal Ji Shrishrimal, Resident Of Near Samta Bhawan, Khatikan Hathoi Road, Beawar District Ajmer At Present District Beawar (Rajasthan)
4. State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, Ajmer (Raj.). 5. Sub Registrar, Beawar, District Ajmer, Presently District Beawar (Rajasthan)
6. Tehsildar Beawar, District Ajmer, Presently District Beawar (Rajasthan)
7. Shri Anil Kumar Jain Son Of Shri Nemichand Jain Shrishrimal, Resident Of Infront Of Jawahar Bhawan, Vinod Nagar Beawar, District Ajmer Presently District Beawar (Rajasthan)
8. Municipal Council, Beawar, District Ajmer, Presently District Beawar (Rajasthan) ----Respondents/Defendants For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saurabh Bhandari
[2026:RJ-JP:6178] (3 of 3) [CW-5590/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 10/02/2026
1. With the consent of both the parties, the present civil writ petition stands disposed of in the following terms:- (i) The order dated 22.01.2025 is hereby quashed and set aside. (ii) The application of the plaintiff-petitioner under Section 12(3)(B)(ii) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is allowed. (iii) The plaintiff-petitioner is permitted to withdraw his claim of specific performance of the contract in regard to the Khasra No.1364. (iv) Both the parties are also in agreement that the plaintiff- petitioner will not claim any damages on any account of default of the defendant-respondent while entering into contract for Khasra No.1364 as per the mandate of the above provision. 2. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J MAHIMA/32