Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010238402025 2026:GAU-AS:189 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3788/2025 ON THE DEATH OF PRADIP CHAKRABORTY HIS LEGAL HEIRS ARATI CHAKRABORTY WIFE OF LATE PRADIP CHAKRABORTY RESIDENT OF PRINCE ROAD SONAI ROAD PS- SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM 2: MISS PUJA CHAKRABORTY DO- LATE PRADIP CHKRABORTY RESIDENT OF PRINCE ROAD SONAI ROAD PS- SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM 3: MISS PRIYA CHAKRABORTY DO- LATE PRADIP CHKRABORTY RESIDENT OF PRINCE ROAD SONAI ROAD PS- SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM VERSUS SHRI BIPRAJIT CHAKRABORTY SON OF LATE BIDHU BHUSAN CHAKRABORTY RESIDENT OF GUNOMOYEE ROAD TARAPURSILCHAR TOWN PS- SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 ------------ Advocate for : MR. P K ROYCHOUDHURY Advocate for : MR. S K GHOSH appearing for SHRI BIPRAJIT CHAKRABORTY Linked Case : RFA/123/2019 SHRI PRADIP CHAKRABORTY S/O- LATE JADAV CHAKRABORTY PRINCE ROAD SONAI ROAD P.S. SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM. VERSUS SHRI BIPRAJIT CHAKRABORTY S/O- LATE BIDHU BHUSAN CHAKRABORTY GUNOMOYEE ROAD TARAPUR SILCHAR TOWN P.S. SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001. ------------ Advocate for : MR. P K ROY Advocate for : MR. S K GHOSH appearing for SHRI BIPRAJIT CHAKRABORTY BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 07.01.2026 Heard Mr. R. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. S. K. Ghosh, learned counsel for the opposite party. Page No.# 3/3 2. This interlocutory application, under Order XXII, Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is preferred by the applicant for substitution of the name of the sole appellant in RFA No. 123/2019. 3. Mr. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the sole appellant in RFA No. 123/2019, namely, Mr. Pradip Chakraborty, had suffered demise on 20.10.2024, leaving behind three legal heirs, namely, Ms. Arati Chakraborty, Ms. Puja Chakraborty and Ms. Priya Chakraborty; and the aforementioned legal heirs are required to be brought on record and as such, this application is filed for substitution of the sole appellant by the applicants herein. 4. Mr. Ghosh, learned counsel for the opposite party submits that he has no objection in the event of allowing this petition. 5. Accordingly, taking note of the submissions of the learned counsel for both the parties, this interlocutory application stands allowed. 6. The name of the applicants be substituted in place of the sole appellant in RFA No. 123/2019. 7. In view of the order passed today in I.A.(Civil) No. 3788/2025, Mr. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the appellant in RFA No. 123/2019, shall file an amended cause title, immediately after reopening of the ensuing Bihu Vacation. 8. In terms of the above, this interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant