Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17213 (PNJ)

RANDHIR SINGH ALIAS DHIRU v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/24081/2026 · 2026-05-05

Alok Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (208) RANDHIR SINGH ALIAS DHIRU STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. No.2 dated (charges framed under Section 354, 354 and 25 of Arms Act) 2. record. 3. Court was not inclined to grant the concession of bail, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the 4. withdrawn, at this stage case. 5. May 05, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RANDHIR SINGH ALIAS DHIRU Versus STATE OF PUNJAB HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Japjot Singh AAG, Punjab. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) Prayer is for grant of regular bail to the dated 18.01.2022, under Sections 354, 379, 323, 427, 506 IPC (charges framed under Section 354, 354-B, 379, 323, 427, 452, 506 of IPC and 25 of Arms Act), registered at Police Station Custody certificate filed by learned State counsel is taken on After arguing vehemently on the merits of the case ourt was not inclined to grant the concession of bail, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as , at this stage without expressing any opinion on the merits of the Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. May 05, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24081-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 05.05.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondent ALOK JAIN Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Japjot Singh AAG, Punjab. Prayer is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR 354, 379, 323, 427, 506 IPC B, 379, 323, 427, 452, 506 of IPC registered at Police Station Bhadson, District Patiala. ficate filed by learned State counsel is taken on After arguing vehemently on the merits of the case, when this ourt was not inclined to grant the concession of bail, learned counsel for present petition, at this stage. In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as without expressing any opinion on the merits of the Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 05.05.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondent petitioner in case FIR 354, 379, 323, 427, 506 IPC B, 379, 323, 427, 452, 506 of IPC ficate filed by learned State counsel is taken on , when this ourt was not inclined to grant the concession of bail, learned counsel for In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as without expressing any opinion on the merits of the MANJU 2026.05.08 12:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document