[2026:RJ-JP:2724] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10118/2011 1. Aayushi Kedawat D/O Dr. Rakesh Kedawat, aged about 17 years (minor) and is being represented through her natural guardian her father Dr. Rakesh Kedawat son of late Shri Rameshwar Kedawat, aged about 50 years, resident of S-3, Sector-5, Star Hospital, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Lovepreet Singh son of Shri Iqbal Singh, aged about 20 years, resident of Village & Post office 8TK, Raisinghnagar, Distt. Sriganganagar (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through its Principal Secretary, Medical Education, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur-302005. 2. Coordinator, PC-PMT-2011 through Registrar, Mohan Lal Sukhadiya University, Udaipur. 3. Federation of Private Medical & Dental College of Rajasthan through its President, 606, Rajvilas 1st ,D-10, Meera Marg, Banipark, Jaipur. 4. Rajasthan University of Health Science through its Registrar, Rajasthan University of Health, Kumbha Marg, Sector-18, Pratap Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur-302033. 5. Medical Council of India through its Secretary, Medical Council of India, Sector-8, Pocket-14, Dwarka-1, New Delhi 110077. 6. Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-110108. 7. Geetanjali Medical College, through its Principal, Geetanjali Medical College, Udaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Soni with Dr. Nitin Soni For Respondent(s) : Mr. Angad Mirdha Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with Mr. Prakhar Jain Mr. Utkarsh Dubey for Mr. Prateek Mathur [2026:RJ-JP:2724] (2 of 3) [CW-10118/2011] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 21/01/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking following prayers: “i) By issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction the counseling for admission in MBBS in Geetanjali Medical College being done from 27th of July to 30th July 2011 on the basis of PC PMT-2011 be quashed and setasided and the respondents be directed to hold the re-counseling by following tripe test of transparency and the law and recommendations being held by the Rajasthan High Court in judgment 31/3/2011 passed in S.B.C.W. No. 9952/2009 for eradicating impersonations and for checking illegalities in medical admissions with all consequential benefits and petitioners be given admission in MBBS course in Geetanjali Medical College as per their merit with all consequential benefits. ii) By an another appropriate writ, order or direction an inquiry be ordered to be done by CBI or CID-CB or by any other authority and the persons indulged in corruption and illegalities be ordered to be punished appropriately. iii) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem think fit and proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners. iv) Costs of the writ petition may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioners.” 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that by efflux of time nothing further survives in the matter. [2026:RJ-JP:2724] (3 of 3) [CW-10118/2011] 3. The said submission could not be disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, as undisputedly the challenge in the petition was made with respect to the admissions made in MBBS course in respondent No.7 - Geetanjali Medical College on the basis of PC PMT (Private Medical College Pre Medical Test)-2011. 4. However, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the two committees which were directed to be constituted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgments in P.A. Inamdar v/s State of Maharashtra reported in 2005 (6) SCC-537, Islamic Academy of Education v/s State of Karnataka reported in 2003(6) SCC-697 and T.M.A. Pai Foundation v/s State of Karnataka reported in 2002 (8) SCC-481, are not functional any more in the State of Rajasthan and thus, necessary directions be issued for ensuring the functioning of the said committees as directed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the aforementioned judgments. 5. As far as submissions regarding functioning of the committee is concerned, it would always be open for the petitioners to take appropriate legal remedies and also to approach the State functionaries regarding functioning of such committees. However, considering the specific prayers made in the present writ petition, no directions qua the same can be issued herein. 6. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J Dipesh Chayal /64